Comments on: LBAM politics, LBAM marketing

By: Gail

Gail — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:52:57 +0000

Thanks for posting this well-written article, based on hard facts. Good references on LBAM!

By: kevinkrejci

kevinkrejci — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:22:24 +0000

Great post. More of us need to quote the facts on the temperature issues like this. The central valley farmers need to know this too. What’s all the rigmarole if they can’t even survive the summer heat in the valley, have been hear for who knows how long, and haven’t caused a bit of harm. I grew up in the central valley and can’t recall many summer days that didn’t get above 89.6ºF

By: cilantro

cilantro — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 05:38:34 +0000

thanks so much for your story. i liked reading the truth for a change.

By: Kathy Smithe

Kathy Smithe — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 05:38:19 +0000

Excellent article. Thank you for posting. It’s refreshing to read from someone that has read the facts. There is no crop damage. The moth is a leafroller and seems to have settled in being here for so many years and natural predators must be eating it. So, let’s have the LBAM removed from the evasive species list! Then the over $25 million++ can be used to study and help the environment and people’s health affect from the spray and capsules.